<body><script type="text/javascript"> function setAttributeOnload(object, attribute, val) { if(window.addEventListener) { window.addEventListener('load', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }, false); } else { window.attachEvent('onload', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }); } } </script> <div id="navbar-iframe-container"></div> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://apis.google.com/js/platform.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript"> gapi.load("gapi.iframes:gapi.iframes.style.bubble", function() { if (gapi.iframes && gapi.iframes.getContext) { gapi.iframes.getContext().openChild({ url: 'https://www.blogger.com/navbar/20077500?origin\x3dhttp://sandrabarkevich.blogspot.com', where: document.getElementById("navbar-iframe-container"), id: "navbar-iframe" }); } }); </script>
Thursday, September 06, 2007

Nalini Singh - World-Building: Laying the Foundations

If you’ve ever been in a live workshop with me, you’ll know that I’m not one for standing and lecturing. For me, a good workshop is all about interaction. So, here’s what I’m going to do. First, a short bit of cyber-lecturing to set the framework of the discussion, then I’ll open the floor up for questions/discussion. But before I begin, I want to say that nothing I say is gospel. Each writer is different, so if you disagree with me, that’s absolutely fine. Take what works for you and run with it.

Now, some quick notes.

What is world-building?

The term “world-building” tends to scare people. Often, folks will run screaming for the hills, saying that it’s too hard, too complicated. Guess what? It’s not. It simply requires a degree of organization and logic.

Of course, the level of interest, in your world will depend on the world itself. But today we’re not talking about how to create an interesting world. Instead, I’m going to focus on laying the foundations of your world, whatever that might be.

World-Building: A Rough and Ready Definition

First, a definition. Roughly speaking, world-building encompasses the vivid and realistic creation of the environment where your story takes place. It doesn’t necessarily have to be an alternate reality or a futuristic world—a regency romance involves world-building. So does a story set in the environs of Formula One racing. The critical factor is this: your reader must believe in the reality of the book, whether that reality is manufactured, present day, or in the past.

So, how do you achieve this reality?

Logic. And if you think you’re not logical, learn. I’m a very organic writer – I do complete first drafts before I know what’s going on. You don’t have to do flowcharts and spreadsheets, either. Some people do collages, others make brainstorming diagrams—find a method of keeping track of your world that works for you.

What do I mean by logic in relation to world-building?

Let’s use an example. Say in my world, all the dogs are blue. If you suddenly have a yellow dog, you have to explain why. Is the yellow dog a spectacular new breed? An unfortunate genetic experiment? Dipped in paint?
Everything must have a reason.

The example above is a silly one, but it serves to make another small but very important point—it’s not world-building if you simply rename things. I.e. If it walks like a duck, talks like a duck, it’s a duck. Every time you rename something, consider this question: What’s the point of difference? What makes this duck unique enough to no longer be considered a duck?

My next point is honesty.

Keep the faith with your readers. If you were writing a contemporary and your hero was in a wheelchair, you wouldn’t have him be miraculously healed just because the heroine needed rescuing—instead, you’d have your hero find another way to achieve his goal. The same reasoning should apply to your world.

If, for example, in your world, men can’t be soldiers, then you can’t suddenly have a male soldier because you need one to get out of a story corner. If you write yourself into a corner, find an honest way to get out of it. Don’t ever cheat a reader. They’ll remember. And they’ll come get you. ;)

But having said that, it’s okay to keep some stuff secret and expose it later. So long as the logic fits, so long as—once they know the secret—the reader is able to see how it slots into the plot. Also, a related point: maintain internal continuity in the book, and in following books if writing a series. It’s all part of keeping the faith.

What is internal continuity?

Quite simply, it’s formed by the parameters of your particular world. A very simple example: if in book 1, there’s an earthquake in the city where you set your story, you can’t have a pristine, unbroken city in book 2. The earthquake has become part of your world and must be carried through.

Romances & World-Building

And last, but definitely not least, a point that applies specifically to romances, paranormal romances in particular. While the love story is the central core of a paranormal romance, the world/paranormal element should be integral to your story.

For example, in Slave to Sensation, the fact that Sascha is Psy and Lucas is changeling is the source of the initial conflict. If we removed those aspects of their character profiles, the book would unravel.

Ask yourself if the same applies to your story. If you can delete the paranormal element and still have basically the same story, then it’s not a paranormal. It might be something else equally good, but if you want it to be a paranormal, the world has to be woven into the very fabric of the story.

That’s the lecture over. Hope you found it of some help. Any questions/comments?

For excerpts, more writing articles and other good stuff, check out my website at www.nalinisingh.com. Also if you’d like to go into a draw to win a $50 Amazon voucher, check out the fun quiz competition I’m running over at my blog www.nalinisingh.blogspot.com (look for the quiz link in the right hand column). It closes Sunday, so be quick!

Labels: , , , ,

29 Comments:

Blogger Diana Castilleja said...

Hi Nalini! Super glad to see you doing this.

I'm actually working on something now, that like you, I didn't know what it was going to do until I'd written it through. It had some issues, so I'm doing a scratch rewrite on it and I'm worried.

Okay, so the basics of the story are the same. The para elements, the theme of the book (which is the first of a series if it wants to be) and several characters. Here's the catch.

I've rearranged the dance card. The H/h are NOT the same in this version, dubbed 2.0 for now. :D I'm trying hard to keep the characters to their original "faces and reactions", but I'm worried since it's a different story that it's not going to ring true.

Has this happened to you? And how did you work through it?

I'm digging deeper into the para elements themselves and making the world building stronger so there's more of an adventure flair in the story, with paranormal elements, and romance.

I hope this makes sense. It's early here, and probably earlier for you! LOL

9/06/2007 08:57:00 AM  
Blogger Sandra Barkevich said...

Ooooo! Excellent question, Diana.

Nalini ~ Thanks so much for sharing such wonderful information. World-building seems to be the big topic right now. We've been talking about it at The Otherworld Diner and today was my day to post over there. Talk about a tough act to follow! Hope people get as much out of my post as they will from yours.

Sandy :-)
Sandra Barkevich - Romance Author

9/06/2007 12:24:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

World building is such a difficult thing for me to do. I wanna be able to stay true to my story and world surrounding it, but I always wonder if I'm pulling it off.

9/06/2007 01:46:00 PM  
Blogger Sandra Barkevich said...

Hmmm...it's been brought to my attention that my link to The Otherworld Diner is non-functional.

Please try cutting and pasting this:
http://otherworlddiner.blogspot.com

Thanks for the heads up, Diana!
Sandy :-)
Sandra Barkevich - Romance Author

9/06/2007 02:14:00 PM  
Blogger Nalini Singh said...

Hi Diana, hmm, if the story is that different, then I'd be hesitant about trying to keep the characters reactions the same. They're not the same people, so their reactions would be very different to each situation.

I know it's tempting to keep what you've already got and edit it, but this might be a situation where you need to do a full rewrite, deleting the old and inserting the new. That's something only you can decide, but if the story flows from characterization, then I believe you have to give those characters the freedom to be themselves. Make sense?

9/06/2007 04:50:00 PM  
Blogger Nalini Singh said...

Shonna - I think practise really makes perfect in this case. That's what I found. I just kept writing and experimenting until one day, I felt like I knew what I was doing. :)

Sandra, I'm sure your post is great! I'm going to go have a look-see.

9/06/2007 04:52:00 PM  
Blogger Diana Castilleja said...

I think I might have phrased that wrong. I was thinking more their personality would be the same, not necessarily their reactions.

Their reactions are true to the character and the (new) siturations, I hope.

I am keeping some of the original world building--a legend, the twist on the traditional shifter idea, and the location--but the story itself is already working itself in another direction compared to the original.

It is going to be a full rewrite, with the exception of the bits above, so unfortunately there really won't be much to be salvaged. *pout*

Do you keep your discarded wips? Do you save scenes for ideas? I do. Packrat syndrome. :D

How long did it take you to figure out the world building for your series? And what part of it came to you first? The characters, the environment, the conflict or something else?

Thanks for answering!

9/06/2007 05:06:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Ok, that makes more sense, Diana!

And I'm a total story packrat. Never know what you might end up using.

The worldbuilding for my series was very instinctive. I started with the characters - Lucas and Sascha were just so vivid. I wrote the first draft, then worked out the fine details. With the series growing, I now keep a story bible with all the details, in order to maintain internal continuity.

9/06/2007 05:15:00 PM  
Blogger Sandra Barkevich said...

Oh! I am a total word packrat. I recently had to revise several chapters for resubmission and, although the chapters were complete rewrites, I could not bring myself to delete the existing scenes. Even though they won't ever be used. In the end, I moved them to the "scratch pad" of the software I use. There they sit, not deleted, but not to be used either. LOL.

Sandy :-)
Sandra Barkevich - Romance Author

9/06/2007 05:31:00 PM  
Blogger Sandra Barkevich said...

Nalini, do you find as you write more books in your series, that you are "learning" more aspects of your world as you go? Perhaps things that didn't occur to you when you began the series? If so, have any of these new aspects conflicted with "rules" you've already set, and how did you handle that?

Thanks!
Sandy :-)
Sandra Barkevich - Romance Author

9/06/2007 05:35:00 PM  
Blogger Diana Castilleja said...

*holds up hand* I totally do Sandy. I think each character sees each portion in a new and vivid way, so different traits and details come out.

Okay, giving the mic back to Nalini.. *grin*

9/06/2007 05:42:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Sandra, I feel as if more and more of my world is uncovered with each book. It's a very natural progression. Sometimes, issues do come up that might conflict with earlier things, and that's when I have to sit down and work out how to put that aspect into the story while keeping internal continuity.

9/06/2007 08:03:00 PM  
Blogger Teresa D'Amario said...

Nalini, I loved this comment:

If you can delete the paranormal element and still have basically the same story, then it’s not a paranormal. It might be something else equally good, but if you want it to be a paranormal, the world has to be woven into the very fabric of the story.

That's very important. Sometimes I read books where the paranormal aspect feels "separate" and it just doens't feel right. When it's totally integrated, then the entire story feels better. Thanks for a wonderful workshop!

9/06/2007 08:31:00 PM  
Blogger Dayna_Hart said...

Nalini, I've thoroughly enjoyed your books. You do reveal a little more with each book...was that conscious planning, or do you find yourself into the new book and thinking "hey! that's a cool twist!"

Do you have a planned number of books for the series and an overreaching story arc?
Do you have plans for some non-Psy books in the future? (yes, that's a fangirl question...:) )

9/06/2007 08:33:00 PM  
Blogger RW said...

Wow once again every one here is as smart as a whip and I am as dumb as a post lol...But Sandy I award you the "you make me smile" award because you very much do :D

P.S. I can't even fill out this stupid word verification ;D

9/06/2007 08:37:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hi Nalini,
I just read my first Nalini story for a review of the Enchanted Season Anthology!
That story is a standalone, yet part of your world fabric, right? Were Tam and Nate created especially for that anthology, or were they already part of that world?
I am hoping to make my world rich enough to accomodate special projects as well.

9/06/2007 08:40:00 PM  
Blogger Sandra Barkevich said...

Oh, Roger, you are very sweet. Thank you. :-)

Everyone, if you love a good chuckle, you should check out Oger the Caveman. I try to visit as often as possible.

Sandy :-)
Sandra Barkevich - Romance Author

9/06/2007 08:57:00 PM  
Blogger Marguerite Labbe said...

I've actually gotten back into world building. I used to do it more often and then drifted off. Now that I'm back to writing more fantasy and dark urban paranormal stories I'm getting into it again.

There's a certain satisfaction I get to worldbuilding. I've always found anthropology fascinating. I like building cultures and mores and the other kinds of glue that sets people apart and brings them together.

I usually start with characters too, one or two will jump out at me. Then I start thinking about the setting I'm going to have them in. Last weekend I took out my atlas and made a map for my new world, tracing over different boundaries I found interesting and as I made the map, other elements of the story came to me. Right now I'm fleshing out the main characters more.

I've found that if I don't set aside some time for world building that I have a couple of strong MCs, but no other people in their lives. They're isolated even in the midst of a big group because they are the only ones who are drawn out.

*Laughs* Okay that's my soapbox for the day.

9/06/2007 09:57:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Thanks to Nalini and Sandra for a great topic!

9/07/2007 12:56:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Teresa - glad you found it useful! And that's something I believe strongly in - the world/story must be emeshed.

Hi Dayna and thanks! Actually, I'm learning about the world as I go along, but it's a very organic process. That's why I always say it's like peeling an onion. It was always there, I just have to be ready to see it!

Re non-Psy books. I've actually got a new series debuting 2009. Book 1 is called "Angels' Blood" and it's about a bounty hunter who tracks down vampires for their masters...the angels. Sound good?

LOL Roger :)

Hi Gwen - Nate and Tammy were already in the books. My world is one of Pack and family, so characters flow through all the books. I think Nate and Tammy have been mentioned in every book to date. Hope you enjoyed their story!

Margeurite, that's an interesting observation about strong secondary characters. I agree that for a solid single title, you need to have a world that's rich in terms of characters, too.

Kaige, hope you found it useful.

Sandra - off to look at that site!

9/07/2007 01:31:00 AM  
Blogger Dayna_Hart said...

Book 1 is called "Angels' Blood" and it's about a bounty hunter who tracks down vampires for their masters...the angels. Sound good?

You just made my fangirl day, Nalini ;)

As a writer it's both heartening to know you don't have every aspect all mapped out...and a little daunting to know you haven't had it all mapped out lol

9/07/2007 08:15:00 AM  
Blogger Anna Campbell said...

Nalini, this is fantastic. Sandra, thanks so much for inviting this brilliant writer (and wonderful person!) over to your blog. I think world building is something every writer does, not just paranormal writers. So I'm lapping this up like brandy alexanders!

Nalini, just bought Caressed by Ice! Can't wait to read it. The first two books in the series were fantabulous! Yeah, sorry for sounding like a fan girl ;-)

9/07/2007 02:56:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Dayna - just think of it as an ever-unfolding adventure. :)

Hey Anna! I would love you to be my fangirl *grin*

9/07/2007 06:03:00 PM  
Blogger Abby Gaines said...

Hi Nalini, I agree with Anna, worldbuilding is a lesson all writers need, even though of us who write contemporary. Thanks for sharing!
Abby

9/07/2007 07:52:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Abby, glad you found it useful! Actually, I was thinking of your NASCAR book when I made that Formula One comment. That definitely required worldbuilding!

9/08/2007 04:15:00 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I don't know if you'll show up here so late, but I do have a question. In your Changeling/Psy world, you are in a futuristic, yet modern world. What made you decide to do the things you did to the world and why?

My characters in my current WIP are in the modern (2007) world, but I've switched history & such to make it work. However, I'm not sure it's working. How do you go about switching things that everyone is aware of? Just curious. :)

9/08/2007 01:25:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hi Kaitlin - soon as I started writing, I knew it was a futuristic. But I didn't want it to be spaceships and flying cars - I wanted it to be a future we could really see happening in our lifetimes. For me, it adds to the intensity of the stories - this world is not so very different from our own.

So every time I make something 'futuristic', I consider whether it would be possible in 50-60 years.

Re your second question: In an alternate reality, which is what I write, and what it sounds like you're writing, you just start from the baseline that your world is the one that exists. For example, Laurell K Hamilton's Anita Blake series starts with the facts as they are in that world. It is your reality - you just need to cue the readers into the fact that this reality isn't the same as the normal world,so they don't get pulled out of that world when you make a switch. Does that make sense?

9/08/2007 08:58:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Also, another note - in my world, I also have to consider things that would exist/be invented because of the abilities of the three races that live in it. :)

9/08/2007 08:59:00 PM  
Blogger Sandra Barkevich said...

Thank you, Nalini, and everyone who participated in my first workshop offering!

Some excellent information was shared. I look forward to many more.

Sandy :-)
Sandra Barkevich - Romance Author
*September 29, 2007 at Sandra's Goings On - Guest Blogger, Frankie Y. Bailey ~ You Should Have Died on Monday

9/09/2007 02:41:00 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home